Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the court’s unanimous answer: protection against excessive economic sanctions is “fundamental to our scheme of ordered liberty.” SCOTUS didn’t provide standards for settling whether a particular fine is unconstitutionally excessive. So, when is a confiscation exorbitant? Does Indiana’s seizure of Timbs’s Land Rover meet this measure?
This landmark incorporation case could have dramatic and far-reaching effects. The foundation of America is built on freedom from government oppression and civilians’ civil liberties being protected above all. Now that the excessive fines clause in the Eighth Amendment has been incorporated, what could this mean moving forward for perhaps the most excessive/cruel and unusual punishment of all, the death penalty?
Even though the 8th Amendment is there for our protection, I believe that it gets in the way of punishing people they that they deserved to be punished. If our country had stricter punishments for certain crimes, crime rates would go down. I'm not saying stricter punishments like cutting someone's hand off for running a red light, just punishments that fit the crime for big crimes.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Gunner. There are crimes that need stricter rules and punishments. However, some charges and the corresponding punishment do not fit. I think this case can hel level out the "playing field" and make sure punishment better fits the crime. -Liberty Cooley
ReplyDelete