In a rare scenario, the Supreme Court is having a public disagreement over a series of death penalty cases. The feud started over the execution of Dominique Ray, a Muslim man who in his last days said his religious rights were violated because he was denied an Imam, a person who leads prayers in a mosque. Even though Christian prisoners are allowed the presence of a Christian chaplain in their execution room, a series of death row prisoners were denied a Buddist or Muslim chaplain.
The SCOTUS judges continued to express their divide with a continued litigation case they presented Monday. The Conservative majority sided against the inmate, choosing to refuse his last religious request. The conservative population is affronted by this decision and does not support the SCOTUS judges' majority decision.
Ray’s case is not the only one of this incident. Another case concerning a Buddist death row prisoner requesting and being denied a Buddist spiritual advisor has only added fuel to the fire of this court dispute.
These cases are being marked as a conservative turning point in SCOTUS history, with a new conservative majority in charge. We can expect to see many more split decisions like these in the future.
What do you think about this feud? Should the condemned get the religious rights they request regardless of their religious affiliation? Should prisons be required to employ a spiritual advisor for every religion to meet the requests of all death row prisoners?
I do not know much about these cases, but based on your blog, I strongly disagree with the conservative judges. I do not know the circumstances, but it seems like the judges are discriminating against Muslims and Buddhists. I think a spiritual adviser should want to be there for the inmates. If a Christian chaplain is being employed, a Muslim or Buddhist one should at least be employed for when they are needed.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that this is even a case really frustrates me. I think it is horrible that people are limiting the religious request to christianity. I think it is very disrespectful to the inmates and makes christianity look bad. No one should be kept away from their religion, especially in a situation like that, and as good christians (assuming they are christians) the court should respect the inmates wishes.
ReplyDeleteI really don't understand how there could be any sound argument that would support the majority decision here. It's a double standard, plain and simple--if Christians are allowed access to chaplains before being executed, then the same should be applied for any religion. If not, then Christians should not have the ability either. The only conclusion I can make is that the conservative justices are making yet another purely partisan decision just because they know they can get away with it. Unless there's more to this that I'm not hearing about, this seems both simple and indefensible.
ReplyDeleteThe Supreme Court being able to blatantly permit such a violation of the Establishment clause is extremely concerning. From what I've read, the Justices in the majority cited that Ray had waited too long to protest. This makes very little sense to me; I don't think the timing invalidates Ray's claim of injustice. Everyone should get equal religious rights. If a prison finds themselves unable to fund a religious figure, I would rather them allow no one access than selectively picking who has religious rights and who doesn't.
ReplyDeleteI don’t know a lot about this, but regardless of religion, the inmates shouldn’t be denied the right to have a religious figure there for them in their final hours. It upsets me that they didn’t allow him to have his religious adviser. The discrimination isn’t fair, they can all have one or none at all.
ReplyDeleteI think it’s ridiculous that this has happened. If a Christian is allowed to have a Christian chaplain, then people from other religions should have the same treatment.
ReplyDeleteIt is awful that this kind of hypocrisy exists. I think everyone should get equal treatment in prisons, including the right to having a spiritual advisor for their particular religion. If Christians are allowed to have this advisor present during their execution, but Muslims and Buddhists are not, that is blantant racism and is incredibly unjust and heartbreaking. This country desperately needs to get over their prejudice with things that are new or different and allow for diversity to flourish.
ReplyDeleteI believe that you should be given the right to have a leader of your religion come to see you as a last request. Christians have the right and so should other religions. Everyone should be treated equal.
ReplyDelete